The media of rapid urease test influence the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori.

نویسندگان

  • Chao-Hung Kuo
  • Deng-Chyang Wu
  • Chien-Yu Lu
  • Yu-Chung Su
  • Fang-Jong Yu
  • Yi-Chen Lee
  • I-Chen Wu
  • Shiu-Ru Lin
  • Chiang-Shin Liu
  • Chang-Ming Jan
  • Wen-Ming Wang
چکیده

BACKGROUND/AIMS The influence of different media on the validity of the rapid urease test, including accuracy, reaction time and cost-effectiveness is evaluated. METHODOLOGY Biopsies were obtained from the antral and body mucosa of 100 KMUH patients (51 men, 49 women; mean age: 54.0 years, range: 21-79 years old) undergoing gastroendoscopy due to dyspepsia. None of the patients had received any Helicobacter pylori eradicating treatment, nor any other antibiotic or bismuth treatment in the previous one month, nor had they had any type of gastric operation in the past. Helicobacter pylori status was evaluated by seven different tests: culture, histology, home-made rapid urease test, 13C-urea breath test, and three different commercially available rapid urease tests--including the CLO test, the ProntoDry test, and the Pyloriset Urease test. Helicobacter pylori status was defined as positive when the culture was positive or if concordance of two of the other three tests (histology, homemade rapid urease test and 13C-urea breath test) was positive. RESULTS Three different rapid urease tests have similar sensitivities (97.3% vs. 100% vs. 100%) and specificities (98.4% vs. 96.8% vs. 98.2%), and accuracy (98.4% vs. 96.8% vs. 98.2%). But the reaction time was longer in the CLO test than for the other two rapid urease tests (22.3 vs. 5.6 vs. 10.1 minutes) (P < 0.05). The ProntoDry test and the Pyloriset Urease test also have more rapid positive rate than CLO test. However, in vitro study, three tests show similar rapidity of positive reaction at different densities of Helicobacter pylori. CONCLUSIONS These three tests have practical advantages for physicians who need a rapid and accurate method of diagnosing Helicobacter pylori infections. The ProntoDry test and Pyloriset Urease test have degrees of accuracy similar to the CLO test, but results are obtained more rapidly and they are cheaper. Furthermore, The ProntoDry test can be stored at room temperature and thereby save on the storage expense.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The Comparative Study of three methods of microscopic, urease test and culture in diagnostic of Helicobacter pylori causing peptic ulcer

Abstract Background and objectives: Helicobacter pylori is a helical gram negative bacterium with polar flagella, discovered by Warren and Marshall in 1983. Helicobacter pylori exist in the stomach mucus tissue of less than 20% of people under 30 years old, but this amount would increase up to 40% and 60% in 60- year- old people. The aim of this study was to compare three methods of culture med...

متن کامل

Compression of Histopathology, Culture and Rapid Urease Test in Diagnosis of Helicobacter Pylori in Gastric Biopsy Specimens

Abstract Background and Objective: Helicobacter pylori (H. Pylori) infection is related to chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer, duodenal ulcer and gastric cancer. Thus, identification and treatment of the infection have a considerable importance. The aim of this study was to compare three methods of Histopathology, Culture and Rapid Urease test (RUT) in identification of H. Pylori in gastric bio...

متن کامل

Determination of Helicobacter pylori Antigen in Stool Samples and Comparison with Rapid Urease Test in Patients Suspected of Helicobacter Infection

Background and Aims: Helicobacter pylori (H. Pylori) is the microorganism that infects nearly half of word's population. There are several invasive and non-invasive methods for diagnosis of infection. The main objective of this study was to evaluate antigen of H. Pylori in feces with H. pylori stool antigen (HpSA) test and comparison with rapid urease test (RUT) in the patients suspected to be ...

متن کامل

Prevalence of Coinfection Helicobacter pylori with Non-Helicobacter pylori Helicobacters Species in Patients Suffering from Gastric Diseases in Iran

Introduction: In addition to Helicobacter pylori, non-Helicobacter pylori helicobacters (NHPHs) have been diagnosed in the humans stomach that caused gastrointestinal diseases. This study aimed to evaluate the coinfection of H. pylori with NHPHs species in patients with gastric disorders in Iran.   Materials & Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on 421 gastric biopsies form dysp...

متن کامل

Comparison PCR Method and Rapid Urease Test to Detect Helicobacter Pylori in the Gastric Biopsy Tissue Samples

Background & Objective: Helicobacter pylori has been recognized as a major risk factor in gastric and duodenum ulcers and gastric cancer. Some laboratory tests, such as culture, are not entirely satisfying. The aim of this study is to compare RUT with PCR in identifying H. pylori in the gastric biopsy tissue samples.Materials & Methods: First, the standard H.pylori sample (N:oC30) was provided....

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Hepato-gastroenterology

دوره 49 47  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2002